
Ponytail
SkillHas the agent follow a 'don't write it if you can avoid it' ladder: ask if it's needed, then reuse existing code, the standard library, platform features and installed dependencies, writing only the minimum while keeping validation, error handling, security and accessibility.
Ponytail
He says nothing. He writes one line. It works.
Ponytail 5: rebuilt from the ground up.
-53% code · -41% time · -26% cost · -45% tokens
And yet: 98% of risky logic ships with a test. Without Ponytail: 68%.
Benchmarked in Claude Code, the same agent with and without the skill: 39 tasks including a real FastAPI + React repo, Opus 5.5, 5 runs each. Details.
Already built with Ponytail
You know him. Long ponytail. Oval glasses. Has been at the company longer than the version control. You show him fifty lines; he looks at them, says nothing, and replaces them with one.
Ponytail puts him inside your AI agent.
Numbers
Two things the chart does not show: in a blind comparison, Ponytail 5's replies beat the previous Ponytail's 110 to 67. And on the six security tasks (SQL injection, path traversal, forged tokens, rate limiting, malformed CSV rows, caching) it passed all 30 runs: less code, no less safe. Method, per-task tables and limits: benchmarks/results/2026-10-07-agentic.md.
The rule was never "fewest tokens." It is: write only what the task needs, and never cut validation, error handling, security, or accessibility. The code ends up small because it is necessary, not golfed. Lower cost and latency are a side effect.
Before / after
You ask for a date picker. Without Ponytail, the agent installs a date picker library or builds a whole calendar by hand: 335 lines. Ponytail 5 first looks at what is already there: the repo has an Input component, and every browser has a date picker. It puts the two together. 10 lines.
More survivors in examples/.
The review, rebuilt
/ponytail-review used to look only for code to cut. Now it reviews like the senior dev who gets paged when it breaks: it reads the code your change touches, not just the diff, and checks bugs, security, real load, missing tests, speed, and what to cut. Each finding says what the code does, what goes wrong, how to fix it, and what happens if you don't.
The audit, rebuilt
/ponytail-audit runs the same checks on the whole repo. It maps the code first: entry points, how data moves, what load the project expects. Then it ranks what it finds and tells you what to fix first. The old audit only listed what to delete.
New in 5.3: the band
In Claude Code, ponytail now shows a band above the prompt: what the current task costs, how many tokens and how much agent time it used, how often it reused existing code instead of writing new code, and whether the tests passed after the last change. Its buttons switch the level, run /ponytail-review or /ponytail-audit, copy the task as Markdown, and fold the band into one line. Don't want it? /ponytail band hides it, the same command brings it back. Needs Claude Code 2.1.290 or later, in the terminal or the desktop app. It does not show in the VS Code chat panel, cloud sessions or claude -p.
Board opens a local page with every task across your projects: cost, agent time and tokens over time, every session with its tests, and the days you worked. By default, everything stays on your machine, in ~/.config/ponytail/band/.
How it works
The ladder runs after it understands the problem, not instead of it: it reads the code the change touches and traces the real flow before picking a rung. Lazy about the solution, never about reading.
Lazy, not negligent: trust-boundary validation, data-loss handling, security, and accessibility are never on the chopping block.
Logic with a branch, a loop, a parser, money or security leaves one small test behind. Every reply ends with what was skipped or not checked and any risk you should know.
The prompt
Ponytail is one prompt: skills/ponytail/SKILL.md. The compact version, for agents that read a rules file, is AGENTS.md. Everything else in this repo loads that prompt into different agents.
Install
Claude Code, as two separate prompts:
/plugin marketplace add DietrichGebert/ponytail
/plugin install ponytail@ponytail
Codex:
codex plugin marketplace add DietrichGebert/ponytail
codex plugin add ponytail@ponytail
Then open /hooks in Codex, trust its two lifecycle hooks, and start a new thread.
Any other agent: copy AGENTS.md into your project, or ask your agent to install skills/ponytail/SKILL.md as a skill. Step by step for Copilot, Cursor, OpenCode, Gemini and the rest: INSTALL.md.
That was it. He'd be proud. He won't say it.
Active every session, with a handful of commands (see Commands). /ponytail ultra exists for when the codebase has wronged you personally. Startup and mode-change text shows the current mode.
Only install ponytail from DietrichGebert/ponytail on GitHub or @dietrichgebert/ponytail on npm. It never ships .exe or .dll files; a copy that does is not mine.
Commands
| Command | What it does |
|---|---|
/ponytail [lite | full | ultra | off] | Set the intensity, or turn it off. No argument switches ponytail on at the default level if it is off, and otherwise reports the current level. |
/ponytail band [on | off] | Claude Code only: hide or show the band above the prompt. No argument switches it. The level stays. |
/ponytail-review | Review the current diff like the senior dev who gets paged when it breaks: bugs, security, real load, risky code without a test, slow paths, and what to cut. Each finding says what the code does, what goes wrong, how to fix it, and what happens if you don't. Name a target in plain words to narrow or widen it: uncommitted, staged, branch, or a PR link. |
/ponytail-audit | The same check for the whole repo, most important first. |
/ponytail-debt | Harvest the shortcut: comments you've deferred into a ledger, so "later" doesn't become "never". |
/ponytail-gain | Show the measured impact scoreboard (less code, less cost, more speed) from the benchmark. |
/ponytail-help | Quick reference for the commands above. |
Commands need a skill-capable host (Claude Code, Codex, Devin CLI, OpenCode, Gemini, Antigravity CLI, pi, Hermes Agent, Qoder, Grok Build). In Codex CLI and the IDE extension they're skills under the plugin's namespace; invoke with $ponytail:ponytail-review. Cursor with the hooks gets /ponytail level switching only, typed as a plain message. The instruction-only adapters (Cursor's rule file, Windsurf, Cline, Copilot, Kiro, Antigravity's AGENTS.md fallback) load the always-on ruleset without the commands.
FAQ
Does it need a config file?
No. An optional ~/.config/ponytail/config.json or PONYTAIL_DEFAULT_MODE env var can set the default level, but nothing is required.
Why does it write shortcut: comments?
They mark a deliberate shortcut and when to revisit it, and /ponytail-debt collects them into a ledger. Want another word, or none? Say so in your project's CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md, then run /ponytail-debt <your word>.
What if I really need the 120-line cache class? You don't. Insist anyway and he'll build it. Slowly. Correctly. While looking at you.
Does it scale? The code you never wrote scales infinitely. Zero bugs, zero CVEs, 100% uptime since forever.
Why "ponytail"? You know exactly why.
Sponsors
License
MIT. The shortest license that works.
Star History
Ressources associées

improve
PluginUses a strong model to audit your codebase and list evidence-backed issues across correctness, security, performance and testing, writes a plan a cheaper model can execute, and reviews the results. It never edits code itself. By shadcn.
shadcn/improve9.2k
Verification Before Completion
SkillRequires the agent to run the full verification commands and read the output before claiming work is done, fixed or passing, backing claims with evidence and ruling out unverified success reports. From the Superpowers workflow.
obra/superpowers300k
Requesting Code Review
SkillBefore finishing a task or merging, dispatches an independent reviewer subagent over a git commit range to check the work against the plan and requirements, then handles feedback by severity: critical, important, minor. Part of obra/superpowers.
obra/superpowers300k
Superpowers
SkillA full development methodology for coding agents: brainstorm a design, break it into an implementation plan, dispatch subagents to build and review each task, with mandatory TDD and systematic debugging. Installed as a plugin, it injects its bootstrap automatically.
obra/superpowers300k
Skills For Real Engineers (Matt Pocock)
SkillMatt Pocock's engineering skills: grill-me interrogates you to align on requirements, to-spec turns discussion into a spec, to-tickets breaks it into tickets, plus tdd, diagnosing-bugs, code-review and more. Run setup-matt-pocock-skills once per repo first.
mattpocock/skills294k
Karpathy-Inspired Claude Code Guidelines
SkillBehavior guidelines drawn from Karpathy's observations of how LLMs go wrong when coding: think before acting, keep it simple, make surgical changes only, and drive work by verifiable goals. Can also be used directly as a CLAUDE.md.
multica-ai/andrej-karpathy-skills220k

